A Blue Eyed Buddhist

Living life in the big city…

Archive for the 'Buddhist stuff' Category

This is a bit of an adventure for me- putting up random thoughts, quotes, and… well, whatever comes to mind. I’m about a year into my Buddhist adventure and I probably should have been writing about it from the get-go. Ah well, better late than never.

Thank goodness we don’t let gays into the military…

Posted by Paul on 3rd May 2010

…can you imagine what kind of things they might do in their spare time to entertain themselves when they’re stationed in Afghanistan?

They might remake Lady Gaga videos, which are about as queer as a three dollar bill! It would be a horrible breakdown of military discipline…

Wait… what?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haHXgFU7qNI

LOL And these are the STRAIGHT guys?

I very much look forward to when we wake up and have a fair policy for anyone to serve in the military. Let’s face it, when gay culture (and believe me- Lady Gaga is 100 bajillion percent “gay culture”) has penetrated that far into the military, actually allowing gay folks to openly serve in the military isn’t going to make a damn bit of difference. Thousands of gay people serve with pride and honor right now, and it’s ridiculous that they are told by their nation that they can’t openly say “yeah, I’m gay”.

Meanwhile, kudos to the brave men (and women) serving in our military, and huge props to them for finding creative uses for their spare time. Great video.

Here’s the original, if you’re curious what the military guys are spoofing/remaking:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQ95z6ywcBY

Posted in Buddhist stuff | No Comments »

Nevada should be embarrassed…

Posted by Paul on 8th April 2010

Here’s a fundraising letter sent by the Governor of Nevada, Republican Jim Gibbons.

It reads like a satirical version of something Sarah Palin would write- except she might actually be a better writer than THIS:

Dear Fellow Nevadans and 1864 Club Members,

Rasmussen Polls Show We Have Pushed Ahead of Rory Reid

as Nevada Voters Realize…We Were Right!

We’ve all seen where this “hopey…changey…feely…and now “believey” kind of stuff” has gotten our great Country…to the Socialist World of Big Government and of Higher Taxes…and to a Government Takeover of the Banks…of the Insurance Industry…of the Car Companies…and now…of the Peoples’ Health Care and their Right to make Personal Decisions with their doctors.

These “hopey…changey…feely…and now “believey” kinda of things will bring our entire country that much closer to a “European Socialist State”…nothing that our Forefathers have Envisioned and nothing close to my Vision for A Nevada Government which is…For the People and By the People.”

The hopey changey stuff I’ve heard before of critisism by Palin of Obama et al…the believey stuff focuses on bs [Brian Sandoval]‘s current theme…the feely accentuates this ploy bs is using, like a song which was cool, but over time gets old/boring/drops off the charts, and it loses its credibility which I believe is dangerous for bs as it puts bs too close to areas of our President’s administration. That polls suggest people have had enough. As the polls are showing, Nevadan Voters Say No to Large Government and are Saying Yes to Lower Taxes…Yes to Smaller Government…Yes to Real Jobs…and Yes to the Vision that The Gibbons Administration has been pursuing!

We’ve Stayed on Track…and remain Locked on Target…and many Nevada Voters are now saying…Yes, Governor Gibbons, You Were Right!

And I say…As Your Governor of Nevada, Battle Born and There for You…We Were Right!

I urge you and your friends to join our growing 1864 Club of Real Nevadans for a Strong and Real Government, By the People and For the People. Join the Our 1864 Club Now!

For $18.64 you can Join the Stampede of Freedom for Nevada …One Click for Nevada…One Click for Freedom…One Click for Lower Taxes and One Click to Join Our Surge for Individual Freedom in Nevada.

Come on board and be part of the charge towards Freedom…For Nevada Families…For All of Us…For Real.

Warmest Regards,

Governor Jim Gibbons

Oh.

My.

God.

Seriously? Really? That’s the best fundraising letter that a governor could come up with?

It’s pathetic on more than one level. First of all, it’s pathetic on how blatantly it’s ripping off Sarah Palin’s syntax and style of talking. Secondly, it’s pathetic that someone who is supposed to be leading a state would intentionally write that poorly. And third, most of all, it’s pathetic that someone would do it INTENTIONALLY, to try and APPEAR all “folksy-charming”, when it’s so obviously calculated and preplanned.

I hope the people of Nevada are embarrassed and ashamed of their governor. I know I would be.

Posted in Buddhist stuff | 2 Comments »

Unsolicited advice- values and religion

Posted by Paul on 14th March 2010

I frequently read the website “Daily Kos”. It’s more than just a single blog; DKos is a political site that’s open to anyone that wants to write a “diary”. They have articles and opinion pieces that run on the front page, but if you submit a diary it goes into a system where anyone can read it, comment on it, or “recommend” it for inclusion in a list of that day’s “top” diaries (meaning it gets featured prominently on the front page for a day or so, and read by many more people.)

Sometimes a diary can even be promoted to the main listing and published right there on the front page, instead of just linked to in the “rec” list (the top recommended diaries) or in the general listing of recent diaries.

Tonight I read one by a young guy who calls himself “The Nephew”. I hadn’t read any of the diaries by his aunt, but it’s pretty apparent the story; he’s a southern-raised guy who is gay and his coming out to his family didn’t go very well.

Now he’s trying to figure out what his life is all about, he’s not living with his parents (his aunt has apparently taken him in), and naturally he’s really wondering about his place in the world, his faith, etc. He was raised Southern Baptist and taught that homosexuality was a nasty sin and a choice; of course his own life disproves that. He knows he’s just gay and that’s all there is to that.

He also always thought of himself as being fairly conservative and believed that liberals are mean nasty scummy people. Of course, what he’s finding is that the conservatives in his life are treating him like something you’d scrape off the bottom of your shoe while his liberal, progressive, Democratic auntie is the one who’s treating him with kindness and respect. The liberals on DKos are being nice to him and telling him to hang in there, etc.

This isn’t to say that all conservatives are like that; there’s plenty out there who would treat a gay kid who’s just coming to terms with his sexuality quite well. Unfortunately for him, those nice conservatives aren’t in his family.

Anyway, tons of people are no doubt emailing the kid (I say “kid” but he’s 18, so legally he’s an adult) with all kinds of advice about being gay, political thought, etc. I figured I’d chime in and wound up writing an essay.

Here is is now. Hope you like it. If you’re curious, it explains a lot of how a Buddhist guy (me) came to think what he thinks, and how I can wind up married to a lapsed Mormon gal like my lovely wife, and how/why we’re reasonably comfortable with where we’re at in terms of religion and faith.

Hey, man… I just read your diaries on DKos. I haven’t read your aunt’s diaries, so I don’t know the whole backstory, but from what you talked about I can guess how things are.

I won’t bore you with tons of stuff about your sexuality- other folks are a lot more qualified to do that. The people on DKos are, by and large, pretty good folks and you’ll get plenty of good advice. You might get some bad advice, too, but part of where you’re at in life is figuring that stuff out on your own. Hell, this email might contain some bad advice. Again, you’ve got to dope it out for yourself. ;)

What I want to yammer on about is faith.

I’m a Buddhist. I grew up Lutheran, which is a pretty mellow religion. It was a compromise, because my mom was quite Catholic growing up and my dad grew up mostly in those midwestern, slightly “holy roller” types of nondenominational Protestant churches- not really really out there, but certainly churches that looked on Catholics very negatively.

I fell away from Christianity ten years ago when my girlfriend of five years died in a car accident. We had lived together all that time, planned on getting married, the whole bit- bought a house, started a business, you name it. Her death was the worst thing that ever happened to me and Christianity didn’t seem to fit at all. It was my “midlife crisis” and pretty tough times.

I wound up a Buddhist because to me, it was the religion and philosophy that made the most sense. I’ve always been a pretty logical thinker, or so I thought, and Buddhism has a way of explaining how and why the world works the way it does that doesn’t rely upon lots of supernatural mumbo jumbo for explanations. (At least my branch of Buddhism does- turns out there’s about as many different branches of Buddhism, maybe more, as there are branches of Christianity.)

Fast forward several years. I met a fantastic woman and we wound up getting married. She is a lapsed Mormon who still thinks that way, believes in God (I don’t), and so forth. Before we decided to get married one thing that we talked about a lot was children and our beliefs and our faith. What would we do if we were married? Would it work? Could we agree on how to raise a child?

These things are obviously important because the parents (as you know) have a lot of influence on the child.

What we wound up deciding is that the individual religions themselves are not as important as the VALUES that underlie our basic thinking. In fact, I believe there is a difference between true “values” and what are basically rules that religions start to try and put onto people.

Your task, my task, everyone’s task is to try and figure out which rules make sense based on what our underlying values are.

My wife and I came to find and believe that our value system was very very much in sync. For example, take sexuality. We both believe that being gay is perfectly okay, that it’s just something about how you are, and that gay people deserve every bit as much love, acceptance, and caring as straight people or anyone else.

Now, my wife believes that people are the way God makes them, and I believe they’re just the way they are because of what’s more or less random happenstance, but the point is that these explanations stem from the religions that each of us have chosen. She still pretty firmly believes in God; I don’t believe in God. The explanation itself doesn’t make any difference in how we believe we should ACT, what we should say and do.

More importantly, it means that if we had a child, we’re in agreement on the values that we would teach that child- that gay folks are just folks, that being gay is not shameful or some kind of “sin”, and that our child needs to treat a gay person just like any other person. In fact, a person is a person FIRST and their sexuality is secondary, just something that in combination with their hair color or skin tone or whatever that’s just part of their overall makeup.

What my wife and I found is that this shared set of values drives us to live the way we live, and even though we have some pretty different religious thoughts overall, since our VALUES are so common the important thing for us would be to raise the child with those values and then let them choose their religion for themselves. We figure we’ll just expose the kid to many different religions, but enforce the values that we believe in, and when the child is old enough, they can choose for themselves.

(It worked out pretty well for President Obama, who was raised this way by his agnostic/atheist mother but wound up a Christian.)

About now you’re probably wondering what the point of all this is.

My point is this: If you choose a religion that goes considerably against your values, in the long run you’re not going to be happy with that religion.

I think that a religion is merely a tool that humans use to try and put their spiritual thinking into a framework that they can understand. Spiritual questions about where we came from, why we’re here, what happens after we die, that kind of thing- that’s big, big stuff, and it’s hard for us to wrap our minds around it sometime.

So we create religions, tens of them, hundreds of them, thousands of them. There’s a ton of branches of Christian churches, there’s Muslim schools of thought, Jewish ones, Buddhists, Sikhs, Hindus, Taoists, and that’s just the bigger world religions… think of how many different religious stories or traditions there used to be when practically every decent-sized aboriginal tribe had their own stories and religion.

Plainly there are a bunch of ways to put spiritual thought into a framework we can understand, right?

I mentioned that my wife was a “lapsed” Mormon. She grew up raised Mormon, went to BYU and everything, but eventually fell away from the LDS church. Why? Mostly because she couldn’t stand the way they choose to preach and act and think about certain things. Homosexuality was a big one, because she had close friends that were (and still are!) gay and she knew that they weren’t horrible sinful people- they’re just folks like anyone else, trying to make it in the world.

She had to look at her base values, look at the church she went to, and decide for herself whether or not to continue taking part in that particular religious tradition. She chose not to.

We have friends that are Mormon, and we value and love them. For them, even some of the teachings that they disagree with aren’t quite enough to drive them out of the church- and that’s okay. That’s how it should be; the vast, vast majority of Mormon folks are very nice people just like anyone else, and their church has a lot of things that are pretty good about it or else it wouldn’t be doing so well.

Ultimately, you are going to have to pick a church or a way of thinking about religion and religious thoughts that fits in with your values.

You might turn out Buddhist, like me, or Muslim or Lutheran. You might stay Southern Baptist, or go Methodist, or Catholic or Jewish or UCC or Presbyterian or who knows what else.

You might even turn out to not believe in much of anything, just be agnostic or atheist and not worry very much about it. I dated one girl who was perfectly comfortable with her religious thought and she basically barely believed in God, not much else, and never went to church at all- and she was pretty happy with that.

My point is that this is an intensely personal choice for you. In fact, it’s far more of a choice than being gay ever was, I’m sure!

But if you wind up rejecting the individual church that you grew up in, please understand that you are not rejecting your own VALUES. Your faith in what you believe isn’t shattered if you leave your church; your baseline values are what matter the most.

Find those values. Get comfortable with them. Know them, love them, embrace them, understand them and why they work for you and what they mean about how you should act in the world.

Then go out and find a church or religion or faith community that shares as much of that kind of thought as possible.

Please believe me, people are going to challenge this assertion. Even your own doubts will tell you, in your head, that if you even think about turning your back on your church that you’re somehow turning your back on your values and your faith.

You’re not. Your faith is what it is. If you really believe in (say for example) the ideas that Jesus taught, then you’re a Christian, and changing your church doesn’t change THAT. More importantly, it doesn’t change those baseline values.

So as you move into this next portion of your life, hang in there, hang tough, and don’t freak out if you find yourself leaving your church behind. Those values that you grew up believing probably still have a great deal of worth.

The individual rules that a particular church might have laid down are going to affect your choice- for example, if you believe that men and women can both be ministers/pastors, then you’re probably not going to wind up staying Southern Baptist, or Catholic for that matter. Some rules might bug you but not be enough to drive you away- like you might believe in total immersion as the way to do baptism, but you might wind up in a church that just sprinkles some water on a baby.

The point is that it’s UP TO YOU. You are the one who’s got to decide which rules that you disagree with, and how much you’ll put up with before you choose to join or leave a particular religion or church.

Just be sure you base that decision on your core VALUES.

Hang in there, amigo. You’ve got a tough time ahead but from your writing it sounds like you’ve got enough of a head on your shoulders that you’ll do okay. You’re very lucky (or blessed, if you prefer) that you have such an awesome aunt who’s willing to demonstrate her values by no doubt pissing off the family and stepping up to help you. Maybe someday you can help someone else like that, or help organizations that do so. For now, just keep doing what you’re doing, and remember those values.

Posted in Buddhist stuff, Odds and Ends | 2 Comments »

Faux News

Posted by Paul on 28th February 2010

One of the biggest problems with the debate in today’s political world is that there are a significant number of people who pay far, far too much attention to Fox News.

The reason this is bad is that Fox News is deliberately partisan, and worse still, they are liars. They intentionally coordinate their message with whatever the Republicans are pushing, and they do not hesitate to lie.

Here’s an example of what I mean:

(here’s the link if you can’t see the embedded video: http://www.dailykos.com/tv/w/002577/ )

This video shows Sean Hannity claiming that then-Senator Barack Obama, then-Senator Hillary Clinton, and Senator Harry Reid were against the use of the process called “reconciliation”.

Today the Democratic Party is in the majority in the Senate and is possibly going to use reconciliation to get some health care reform through.

The thing is… Hannity is a liar. In the segment, there’s a little insight into the truth- these Senators were NOT speaking about reconciliation. They were discussing the Senate potentially using the “nuclear option”… but what they referred to as the “nuclear option” is NOT the reconciliation process.

The nuclear option, in the context of the Senate, is a process that would basically use a parliamentary procedure to end a filibuster. This is different than reconciliation, which prevents a filibuster from starting in the first place. Slate ran a pretty good explanation of it.

The nuclear option was being discussed by Reid, Clinton, and Obama in 2005 when the Democrats were trying to stop some of the Bush Administration’s judicial appointments.

The point here is that reconciliation to pass changes to spending and the law is a different deal than the nuclear option- and Hannity KNOWS that. He knows that very well, and yet in today’s context he aired that video of Reid, Clinton, and Obama, trying to make it look like they were against reconciliation just a few years ago and now are for it.

In other words, he’s lying. Worse still, he’s using his lie to smear his political opponents. (It’s one thing to merely lie about what your side wants; it’s another thing to lie about the other guys’ morality.)

And do you know why Hannity had to use video of Obama, Reid, and Clinton talking about the nuclear option and NOT video of them talking about reconciliation? It’s because they didn’t oppose the use of the procedure back then. Oh, they opposed the bills that the Republican majority in the Senate were trying to pass, but they didn’t speak out against reconciliation.

In other words, Hannity couldn’t find video that actually makes them hypocrites, so he used video of them talking about something else. It was a deliberate choice to try and make his opponents look bad.

Oh, by the way, reconciliation? That process has been used 22 times to pass bills in a method that avoids filibusters since 1980. (See this and this.)

Out of those 22 times, 16 of them were accomplished by Republican-majorities in the Senate. That’s right- over 70% of the times that a party used reconciliation, it was the Republicans.

So remember, the next time you see some Republican Senator like Alexander, Hatch, McConnell, Gregg, Grassley, or Snowe talking about how bad the Democrats using reconciliation would be, remember that THEY were the ones who used it just a few years ago to pass some of President Bush’s tax cuts.

Posted in Buddhist stuff | No Comments »